The FG’s 2025 Cybercrimes Act is now fully in force. On paper, it addresses real problems: hacking, data breaches, fake news, and ethnic incitement. But in practice, it risks trading digital order for digital fear.
First, the good intent. Unauthorized access, tampering with data, and disclosure of critical infrastructure deserve jail terms. Nigeria loses billions yearly to fraud and leaks. Section 3, 4, and 5 give law enforcement tools it lacked. The life sentence for inciting ethnic hatred under Section 24 also signals that online division will not be treated as “just talk.”
Second, the chilling effect. Sections 10, 19, and 22 are dangerously vague. Recording your own conversation without “authorization” can get 2 years. “False or misleading information” and “rude, vulgar, offensive” posts can also land creators in jail. Who decides what is false? What is offensive? In a political climate, those terms become weapons against dissent, satire, and journalism.
Third, the admin liability trap. Making WhatsApp group admins criminally liable for members’ posts forces censorship by default. Most admins are volunteers, not lawyers or police. To avoid prosecution, they will delete, ban, and self-silence. That kills open debate.
“Ignorance is no excuse” is true for law. But a law that is broad, subjective, and unevenly enforced becomes an excuse for harassment itself.
Nigeria needs cyber safety. We do not need a law where freedom of expression survives only at the mercy of whoever is interpreting it. Clarity, independent oversight, and narrow definitions must come next or the Act will protect the powerful more than the public.
+2348039289375
bcradle@ymail.com